some series just got lost
we suddenly lost a complete page of posts

not even twin knows how as we can still read his reply but they are just gone
I think Noname has to repost them if Noname wants to.
for out of my collection I would not know wich series it was you want

Well, not only I can delete posts, but so can the user as well. Everyone has the ability to delete their own post/pictures if they so wish. An automated password is provided with each and every post that can be used at the bottom right of the page to delete any checked posts. I'm not saying that is the case, but it could very well be.

I'd like to keep posting, but I got spooked by legal issues. Re-read Ashcroft vs. Free speech, and got the idea my posts might not be legal from US. Anyone know for sure?
Again, I love to create and post, feel I'm pretty good at it, but don't want to get in trouble.

>>4
Noname
It's perfectly legal in the states. Just visit your local FBI field office and ask them. It's NOT a violation.

It is true, 3D posts such as these are no illegal within the states. The law states that any art that is based on a real person that is underage to pose and is related to pornography in any way, is illegal and can be prosecuted. I do not see 3D being a violation of this law, and thus, fully legal.
I do not practice law at all. Even though I was in a intro. class for Criminal Justice, but that was from research on the web about it. Google helps quite a bit with that.

"Just visit your local FBI field office and ask them." Uh, yeah, I'll head right over.

Anyhow, here's the thing, and I'm not trying to stir up any hornets nests here, but what about this, from the 2003 "Protect" act (look it up in Wikipedia)

-Prohibits drawings, sculptures, and pictures of such drawings and sculptures depicting minors in actions or situations that meet the (Miller test) of being obscene.

>>7
Noname
That was turned over by the US supreme court because it's against free speech concerning art. I know which law you are referring to. As long as the 3D characters are not morphed from real people, then its NOT a violation. If it had been a violation, you would of been visited by the feds by now.

then all poser character files with original skin are save
they are rendered from art-work

that also answered a question I once asked about my country's law

>>7

Actually, I already did that. I have a cousin who works for the FBI, and he specifically said after showing a few of the pictures to his superiors and get confirmation from them and the DOJ, that they are NOT illegal!

Now, if you have these kind of pictures and actually molest a child..... then they can use them to try and get you a stiffer sentence, but no judge would let them in because they are too prejudicial and that outweighs their usefulness in court.

>>10 Come on down to Sunny Australia and waltz into any local police station with some printed pics of what is available at this site..you wont be walting out again I can assure you...stumbling with cuffs on and a jacket over your head maybe...

>>12

That the thing idiot, Australia has DIFFERENT laws than the United States, and are getting to be a religious autocracy now, so I wouldn't go there anyway!

Australia was started by convicts, so I'm seriously wondering why they are courting the religious radicals who are the ones who sent most of their ANCESTORS there.

>>13
It is true, different countries have different laws. Now, no more calling each other names.

>>8 Hate to interject, but when I see incorrect info on the net and someone can get in trouble over it, I feel compelled to do so. Protect Act of 2003 has NOT been overturned, and is in full force. Everyone involved in any kind of art should read it, because it addresses every aspect, including 3-D. If you show what the common man will perceive as a child in a sexual situation (such as 3-D graphics), you can be charged, under this Act - unless you can prove that to most it has artistic merit. Yeah, good luck with that one. None of us should take the advice of anyone online, without verifying the information with legal counsel. We did check, and he confirmed this for us. And, don't listen to me, either. Read the wikipedia info and check with an attorney, before you risk your freedom.

>>15
Wiki is good for some info, but I wouldn't even trust it myself when it comes to the law. Anyone can change the info, so some could be falsified. It's best to check with the Police Department or something anyway, that's the best source to ask questions regarding US law.

>>16 I concur wholeheartedly with your point about wikipedia, for it is subject to whims, which is why we pointedly suggested everyone consult an attorney, before making life-altering choices. For fifty USD it is cheaper and the conversation is confidential, by law, whereas any conversation with a policeman is allowed as testimony, even when asking advice. Ask a cop if something is legal and you stir up his interest, because he knows you would not ask unless you had an interest in the topic. We suggested Wiki only because they have the links to the entire law, so one can read it for themselves.

>>12

Why are you walking into the police station in the first place?