[Burichan] [Futaba] [Gurochan] [Neko Black] [Photon] - [Home] [Contact]

[Return]
Reply mode

No.1   [Reply]

Sorry, a little more:

The prohibitions against illustrations depicting child pornography, including computer-generated illustrations, were previously ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court when they were included in the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996. However, the provisions of the Protect Act are distinct, since they establish the requirement of showing obscenity as defined by the Miller Test, which was not an element of the 1996 law.

>> No.2  

I have a question for all:

Why those discussions with 3D drawings and never (or rarely) with Loli Hentaï ? What is the "moral" difference between the one and the other? It's a odd thing for me.

By another way...

"Prohibits drawings, sculptures, and pictures of such drawings and sculptures depicting minors in actions or situations that meet the (Miller test) of being obscene."

I don't know american law, but in my country, there is a similar law (which include writtings, and that is particulary stupid, because you find in many prestigious collections, le Marquis de Sade, Pierre Louys, Appolinaire, etc... who, all, despite in their books sexual relationships, sometimes violent, with children).

Anyway, beside some publications and public exhibitions, I don't see how this law could be bring to operation.

Yours.

>> No.3  

that is just the thing Jacques
there is none

btw hentai has to be translated as
"metamorphosis" or "abnormality" (wikipedia)
in the context of art it mostly means
abnormality and therefore mostly is against all laws as it often gets to the kiddie stage
but that is only if you talk about 'hentai seiyoku'
or 'perferted pornographic hentai' (translated)
you can read the rest here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hentai

last note hentai is older than the paper we know.
and most of it is about old people

>> No.4  

"le Marquis de Sade, Pierre Louys, Appolinaire, etc... "
monsieur jacques, can you give others name plz ?

>> No.5  

I think (not sure) that lolikon follows the same rule. It's legal in Japan, as the interest is not considered "prurient" (unwholesome), and is sold openly!! The standard is just different in the more conservative US, where Lolikon is NOT on sale.

>> No.6  

>>5
It's because of most parents and of course, our government. They have more things to worry about than just simple lolicon. >.> Besides, it doesn't hurt the public, does it? no.. not since I last checked on the matter.
Last time I did check though, lolicon was only discouraged upon, but not illegal.

>> No.7  

What I want to mean is why 3D drawings seem to be more "offensive" for some people (look at the senseless remark of mr E) than Hentai Lolikon ? Because of their realism? it's stupid. They are realistic in the way classical painting may seem realistic. If you visit the Louvres, you will see a great amount of realistic nudes, of realistic scenes of sexuality and crualty. And nobody is affected by that.

And for me, even if it's less "realistic", Hentai Lolikon is more exciting than 3D, and if I had the talent to do that sort of pictures, I will do.



Delete Post []
Password